Rick Santorum afraid of mighty Polandball

So i've heared that that dude announced in New Hampshire that the greatest threats to USA are : Iran, Egyptian Islamists and .... Poland ?!!!!

http://wiadomosci.wp.pl/title,Najwiekszym-zagrozeniem-dla-USA-sa-Iran-islamisci-i-Polska,wid,14144584,wiadomosc.html

http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/uriks/Santorum-frykter-Polen-6735615.html

what the fuck

>in Polandballish

No u

It's also in norsk if you prefer

He's afraid of plumbers

Probably Poland and Pakistan mean the same for him after all both start with P and the dude is american

Fausto Sozzini wrote:

Probably Poland and Pakistan mean the same for him after all both start with P and the dude is american

I think you meant republican.

Lord Moe wrote:

Fausto Sozzini wrote:

Probably Poland and Pakistan mean the same for him after all both start with P and the dude is american

I think you meant republican.

No I'm pretty sure he meant American.

Faust you must join great orthodox union before they attack

Djeza wrote:

Faust you must join great orthodox union before they attack

What exactly has this Orthodox Union done?

Djeza wrote:

Exactly.

ok one of polish students mailed rick santorum and he received an answer.

He(Rick) was naming coutries where Obama made mistakes in his foreign policy (Iran,Honduras,Egypt and Poland(the missile shield))

That norwegian newspaper VG.no made an artice claiming that those were countries he claimed to be a threat for US. And then the polish news portal quoted it.

So we got trolled by Norway

It's part of the Breivik plot. Well done, Norway.

Also, quite funny this Rick dude. Obama "mistakes"; in Iran (probly because he didn't bomb it), Honduras ( da fuq ???????) and Egypt (Obama should have helped quelling the Arab Spring, I guess).

Also, the "Missile shield" shit. The biggest threat to the world is not many countries having nuclear weapons, but one of them (USA) becoming capable of striking at will without fear of reprisal.

maegalodonus wrote:

It's part of the Breivik plot. Well done, Norway.

Also, quite funny this Rick dude. Obama "mistakes"; in Iran (probly because he didn't bomb it), Honduras ( da fuq ???????) and Egypt (Obama should have helped quelling the Arab Spring, I guess).

Also, the "Missile shield" shit. The biggest threat to the world is not many countries having nuclear weapons, but one of them (USA) becoming capable of striking at will without fear of reprisal.

Except that the citizenry would never stand for a nuclear attack.

America should make its shield, and then disarm. It would calm everyone down AND protect them from China, win win.

Vahir wrote:

Except that the citizenry would never stand for a nuclear attack.

America should make its shield, and then disarm. It would calm everyone down AND protect them from China, win win.

Orly?

Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, napalm and phosphorus in Vietnam, ...
Don't know bout you, but I'd rather trust for peace those Russian ICBM's capable of zero-grounding USA than giving a blank check to the -obese- US citizenry and their government.

Also I forgot that bit of the script about "USA being the good guys and the others being the bad guys" a long time ago...

Regarding China, if you look at their history they have been mostly a pacific, non-expansionist country. Same could be said about Iran. You would have to go far back in time, possibly to the times of the early Byzantine Empire for historical memory of a war started by Iran.

maegalodonus wrote:

Vahir wrote:

Except that the citizenry would never stand for a nuclear attack.

America should make its shield, and then disarm. It would calm everyone down AND protect them from China, win win.

Orly?

Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, napalm and phosphorus in Vietnam, ...
Don't know bout you, but I'd rather trust for peace those Russian ICBM's capable of zero-grounding USA than giving a blank check to the -obese- US citizenry and their government.

Also I forgot that bit of the script about "USA being the good guys and the others being the bad guys" a long time ago...

Regarding China, if you look at their history they have been mostly a pacific, non-expansionist country. Same could be said about Iran. You would have to go far back in time, possibly to the times of the early Byzantine Empire for historical memory of a war started by Iran.

And for 70% of its existence, the USA was isolationist. What's your point?

Also I forgot that bit of the script about "USA being the bad guys and the others being the good guys" a long time ago...

i quite enjoy videos of this guy

Fausto Sozzini wrote:

i quite enjoy videos of this guy

>Amazing Atheist

Just kill yourself now.

America and Russia should join forces and nuke the rest of the planet into submission before we are wiped out in an asteroid strike.


I have always heard the two could effectively remove a couple of feet from the Earth's surface.

10/10

hUNGRY JE SRBIJE

Vahir wrote:

And for 70% of its existence, the USA was isolationist. What's your point?

Also I forgot that bit of the script about "USA being the bad guys and the others being the good guys" a long time ago...

That's not part of my script either. I leave goody-good and simplistic storylines vomited in some propaganda lobby office and echoed in the media for Canucks to swallow them whole with maple syrup on top, thank you very much.

My point is that I'd rather have a balance of power in the world than one single country (whatever country, but much less the USA considering its past record -world record- of bombing places with cute bombs and the kind of politicians popping up and appealing and getting some nice poll results from the goody-good US citizenry every now and then) having the monopoly on nuclear strikes.

Indeed.